Randy Stufflebeam

Thoughts. Truths. Tangents.

Ron Paul's "Audit the Fed" Campaign: What Happened (and Why It Matters)

Ron Paul's push for a full, independent audit of the Federal Reserve was a hallmark of his congressional tenure (1987–2013), but it never resulted in the comprehensive transparency he envisioned. He introduced versions of the Federal Reserve Transparency Act (H.R. 1207 in 2009, and iterations through 2012) repeatedly, arguing that the Fed's "most crucial activities"—like monetary policy deliberations, open market operations, discount window lending, and foreign agreements—were shielded from meaningful oversight. Paul framed it as a matter of accountability: The Fed, a quasi-private entity created by Congress in 1913, wields immense power over the economy without full congressional scrutiny.

The Fed does undergo regular audits, but they're limited:

  • Financial audits: Conducted annually by independent external auditors (e.g., Deloitte) on the Fed's balance sheets, operations, and reserves. These are public and cover "bean-counting" like assets/liabilities.
  • GAO audits: The Government Accountability Office (nonpartisan arm of Congress) can review specific areas, like emergency lending (thanks to Dodd-Frank in 2010, which stemmed from Paul's efforts). This revealed, for instance, $16 trillion in low-interest loans to banks during the 2008 crisis, including foreign ones.

But Paul's bill sought a one-time, full GAO audit of everything, including policy decisions and foreign dealings, with results reported directly to Congress within 90 days. Critics (e.g., Fed Chair Ben Bernanke) called it a "nightmare" that would politicize the Fed, exposing deliberations to short-term pressure and undermining its independence—which studies show leads to lower inflation and better economic stability.

Key Milestones in Paul's Efforts

Here's a quick timeline of his major pushes and outcomes:

Year

Continue reading
18 Hits
0 Comments

Satan is not opposed to good morals - GREG’S RESPONSE

Satan is not opposed to good morals

GREG’S RESPONSE

 

Greg Moeller

So, living according to God's principles is irrelevant to God? Hmm, I wonder i f I could find a explicitly clear verse, or two, or scores, to refute that, NT or OT or both?

I fully get the need for Christ, but is he your Lord if you live in complete violation to his commandments? Is living righteously irrelevant, even to the extreme ends, to eternal life? Are there not warnings in scripture to Christian believers to not fall into the practice of grievous sins? Hmmm...

[1Co 6:9-11 KJV] 9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, 10 Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And such were some of you: but ye are washed, but ye are sanctified, but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of our God.

Continue reading
21 Hits
0 Comments

Satan is not opposed to good morals

 

Satan is not opposed to good morals

Judy Tadlock Herbert - Satan is not opposed to good morals - Facebook Post

 

  • He’s opposed to Jesus Christ.
  • Read that again because most Christians miss this completely.
  • Satan doesn’t care if you’re a “good person.” He doesn’t care if you volunteer at the food bank, recycle your trash, and help old ladies cross the street. He doesn’t care if you’re kind, generous, and well-liked by everyone in your community.
  • He cares that you don’t bow the knee to Jesus.
  • Here’s the deception that’s damning millions: Satan has convinced people that morality equals spirituality. That being a “good person” is the same as being a Christian. That if you just live right, treat people well, and avoid the “big sins,” you’re acceptable to God.
  • This is a lie straight from the pit of hell.
  • The Pharisees had impeccable morals. They followed the law meticulously. They were respected, disciplined, and religiously devoted. Jesus called them children of the devil. Why? Not because their morals were bad.  Because their morals replaced Christ.

 

  • Satan’s greatest trick isn’t making bad people worse. It’s making good people think they don’t need a Savior. Think about it:
    • The atheist who feeds the homeless thinks he’s good enough without God.
    • The Buddhist who meditates and practices compassion thinks she’s enlightened without Christ.
    • The Muslim who prays five times daily thinks he’s righteous without Jesus.
    • The moral Christian who goes to church, pays his tithe, and avoids scandal thinks he’s saved without surrender.
  • All of them are headed to the same place: eternal separation from God. Because morality doesn’t save. Jesus saves.

“For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any man should boast.” Ephesians 2:8-9

Continue reading
16 Hits
0 Comments

Righteousness and Salvation - My Response

Righteousness and Salvation

A Response to Greg

 

 This article responds to Greg’s comment on a Facebook post titled “Satan is Not Opposed to Good Morals,” which argued that Satan promotes morality as a substitute for faith in Jesus Christ. Greg’s response suggested that living righteously according to God’s principles is essential for salvation, citing scriptures to support his view. While I agree that faith and works are connected, I believe Greg’s perspective risks equating moral living with righteousness, which can obscure the true path to salvation. Let’s explore why faith in Jesus Christ, not our own righteousness, is the foundation of eternal life.

For reference, here's the text from Greg's response that I responded to.

 

The Misconception of Righteousness

Greg seems to equate “doing good” or “living morally” with righteousness, implying that such actions contribute to salvation. This view might suggest that Jesus should have:

Continue reading
54 Hits
0 Comments